Comments on: Sweden: Research into GE trees risks irreversible damage to forests http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/ Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:59:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: bluE http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/#comment-735 Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:20:45 +0000 http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/#comment-735 these people are of the worst type.they need to be stopped,obviously they have not the decency to stop them self, there will always be people like this who need to have their brakes applied for them, anything for money .

]]> By: Chris Lang http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/#comment-723 Mon, 19 May 2008 15:53:37 +0000 http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/#comment-723 Thanks for this – you are right. In April 2007, Nilsson retracted the 2005 paper in Science. The interview with Eva Krutmeijer on the Linnaeus300 website includes the following statement:

In April 2007 Professor Nilsson announced that the important work carried out by a guest researcher into the signal molecule responsible for controlling plants’ flowering could not be reproduced. He accordingly decided to withdraw the acclaimed article published in the journal Science in 2005. This setback does not affect his work in the field of forestry or any other publications from his research group.

]]> By: T http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/#comment-722 Sun, 18 May 2008 21:52:08 +0000 http://chrislang.org/2007/08/27/sweden-research-into-ge-trees-risks-irreversible-damage-to-forests/#comment-722 Has this paper not been retracted?

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2007/April/19040701.asp

]]>