Sweden: Research into GE trees risks irreversible damage to forests

27 Aug

A Swedish scientist is leading the way in GE tree research into flowering. The risks to the world’s forests are enormous.

By Chris Lang. Published in WRM Bulletin 121, August 2007.

Professor Ove Nilsson is the star of genetically engineered tree research in Sweden. Nilsson and his research team at the Umeå Plant Science Centre won the race to identify the gene that controls plants’ flowering allowing them to produce genetically engineered trees which flower in weeks, instead of years. In 2005, the journal Science declared it one of the most important discoveries of the year.[1]

“Finding the start button for tree flowering means that we understand the underlying molecular processes. It means that we can press the start button instead of awaiting the natural course of things. In this way we can get trees to flower when we want them to,” Nilsson explains in an interview with Eva Krutmeijer on the Linnaeus300 website.[2]

Selective breeding of trees takes many generations, especially with cold climate trees such as spruce and aspen, which flower after 10 to 15 years. One of the reasons that eucalyptus is so popular as a plantation tree species is that it flowers in two or three years, allowing rapid breeding for characteristics such as fast growth and straight stems.[3]

Nilsson’s quick flowering trees allow him to work on producing faster growing trees for cold climates. Nilsson argues that faster growing trees and trees which will grow in colder climates are needed to meet increasing demand. Nilsson doesn’t even consider the possibility of reducing consumption. “The only way we are going to cope with rising demand is increase forest productivity,” he told the Sydney Morning Herald in July 2007.[4]

Nilsson isn’t really talking about increasing “forest productivity”. He’s talking about increasing productivity from industrial tree plantations. The fast growing eucalyptus plantations that Nilsson admires have dried out streams and lowered water tables, leaving local communities without water supplies in many countries in the South. Faster growing trees in cold climates would also need more water. Faster growing tree monocultures have already replaced many native forests and other ecosystems in Europe and North America. Growing GE trees for biofuel, another area of interest for Nilsson, would require vast areas of land – land which is often already in use for food production, for example.[5]

In recognition of his research, Nilsson will be awarded the Marcus Wallenberg Prize in Autumn this year.[6] The prize indicates who will benefit from Nilsson’s research – the pulp and paper industry and the biofuel industry. The Marcus Wallenberg Prize was set up in 1980 by Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags, now pulp and paper giant Stora Enso. The prize is named after Marcus Wallenberg, a banker, industrialist and chairman of Stora’s Board of Directors.[7] While the Marcus Wallenberg Prize claims a focus on “Sustainability of renewable resources”, it also “recognizes efficiency improvements, cost improvements, the opening of new markets and the underlying research”.[8]

Nilsson isn’t worried about the risks of genetically engineered trees. He claims that his GE fast-flowering trees will only be planted in sealed greenhouses. Once he has produced high yielding trees, the flowering gene can be bred out and the trees to be planted will not contain any foreign genes.[9]

But Nilsson’s activities are not limited to laboratory research. He is a board member of SweTree Technologies, a Swedish biotechnology company. The company specifically aims to provide products and technologies “to improve the productivity and performance properties of seedlings, wood and fiber” for the pulp and paper industry.[10] Also on the board of SweTree Technologies is Björn Hägglund, a former Deputy CEO at Stora Enso and a board member of the Marcus Wallenberg Foundation[11]. Hägglund is the chair of the board of WWF Sweden[12], which could explain why we don’t hear much criticism of GE trees from WWF Sweden.

SweTree Technologies was formed in 1999 as a joint initiative of the Foundation of Technology Transfer (Innovationsbron) in Umeå and the company Woodheads AB. Innovationsbron aims to profit by commercialising Swedish research and innovation. Woodheads AB was formed to handle the intellectual property from 44 researchers at the Umeå Plant Science Centre and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. SweTree Technologies’ website boasts that it has “the right to all innovations in plant and forest biotechnology emanating from the members of Woodheads”.[13]

SweTree Technologies is working on trees genetically engineered for increased biomass growth, increased fibre length and to produce wood that is easier to pulp (with more easily extracted lignin content).[14] Three Swedish forestry companies (Sveaskog, Bergvik Skog and Holmen) are part-owners of SweTree Technologies.[15] Clearly the GE trees developed by SweTree Technologies will not remain in greenhouses. Once GE trees are planted it is inevitable that they will cross with trees in forests. The impacts are unknown and irreversible.[16]

Nilsson has a vision of the future: “Trees will be ‘tailor-made’, clearly earmarked for their end uses. Examples of these are fast-growing porous trees for the pulp industry, trees with long wood fibres for the paper industry, slow-growing trees for furniture manufacture.”[17] In reality this means vast monocultures of genetically engineered trees. It has nothing to do with sustainability or concern for the environment. It is about profit for industry.


[1] Ove Nilsson“, interview by Eva Krutmeijer, Linnaeus300 website.

[2] Eva Krutmeijer, “How far may we go in manipulating plants?”, Linnaeus300 website.

[3] Louise Williams, “By gum, it just might be a solution“, Sydney Morning Herald, 19 July 2007.

[4] Louise Williams, “By gum, it just might be a solution“, Sydney Morning Herald, 19 July 2007.

[5] SeeAgrofuels: Towards a reality check in nine key areas, Transnational Institute, July 2007.

[6] Discovery on regulation of flowering is awarded the Marcus Wallenberg Prize 2007“, Marcus Wallenberg Prize website, 6 February 2007.

[7] Dr. Marcus Wallenberg“, Marcus Wallenberg Prize website.

[8] The Marcus Wallenberg Prize“, Marcus Wallenberg Prize website.

[9] Louise Williams, “By gum, it just might be a solution“, Sydney Morning Herald, 19 July 2007.
Eva Krutmeijer, “How far may we go in manipulating plants?”, Linnaeus300 website.

[10] Putting more value into trees and wood fibres“, SweTree Technologies website.

[11] Board of Directors“, SweTree Technologies website.
Board of Directors Marcus Wallenberg Prize website.

[12] WWF in Sweden“, WWF Sweden website.

[13] Woodheads Research“, SweTree Technologies website.
Mendel Biotechnology and SweTree Technologies extend their collaboration“, SweTree Technologies press release, 12 April 2007.

[14] Transgenic trees“, SweTree Technologies website.

[15] Three Swedish Forestry Companies Invest in SweTree“, SweTree Technologies press release, 9 November 2006.

[16] See Chris Lang, “Genetically Modified Trees: The Ultimate Threat to Forests“, World Rainforest Movement and Friends of the Earth International, December 2004.

[17] Eva Krutmeijer, “How will we use trees in the future?”“, Linaeus300 website.


3 Responses to “Sweden: Research into GE trees risks irreversible damage to forests”

  1. T 18 May 2008 at 10:52 pm #

    Has this paper not been retracted?


  2. Chris Lang 19 May 2008 at 4:53 pm #

    Thanks for this – you are right. In April 2007, Nilsson retracted the 2005 paper in Science. The interview with Eva Krutmeijer on the Linnaeus300 website includes the following statement:

    In April 2007 Professor Nilsson announced that the important work carried out by a guest researcher into the signal molecule responsible for controlling plants’ flowering could not be reproduced. He accordingly decided to withdraw the acclaimed article published in the journal Science in 2005. This setback does not affect his work in the field of forestry or any other publications from his research group.

  3. bluE 28 June 2008 at 11:20 pm #

    these people are of the worst type.they need to be stopped,obviously they have not the decency to stop them self, there will always be people like this who need to have their brakes applied for them, anything for money .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: